Porn: Why so Rampant?

Here’s a shortened version of what famous lecturer Jordan Peterson said: “One of the reasons that pornography is so rampant, even among people who are in relatively permanent relationships, is that it’s a bad approximation to a good art. It’s that people’s sexual longing is deep and plastic, and it takes an awful lot of courage to make what it demands consciously apprehensible and communicable and to share that desire with the person you love. That’s the true revelation of nakedness.”

What a muddled mess! Instead of the spiel of Mr. Word Salad, here’s directness: Porn is rampant since men are deprived of sex because of women’s lib. And because it’s addictive while being mostly free. THE END. Explanations are often turned into something barely understandable and opaque because of near universal censorship. If famous people spat out the truth in our modern era, they would fear losing their popularity, career, and suchlike. Even so-called conservatives who hold to some traditional values are highly compromised.

In this case, the answer to the problem would be obvious: Ensure that men are able to acquire wives at an early age, and that said wives are required to do their conjugal duties regularly as it was throughout history. This would require defeating all of feminism, not just “radical” feminism as Mr. Peterson feels he is allowed to contend.

And of course, a national block on Internet pornography as they have in some countries. But since foolish rebellion reigns, society screams about supposed unfairness to women and the evils of censorship. Without putting away selfishness and using wisdom, this issue will just get bigger. Facts.

*****My posts organized according to subject=

https://wordpress.com/settings/taxonomies/category/kcsunbeam.wordpress.com

Asexuality

Don’t let anyone tell you that asexuality, the lack of sexual attraction and/or lack of interest in sexual activity, is abnormal. In fact, everyone on Earth was born asexual and remained so for years of their childhood.

Some adults are asexual too, women far more often than men because of being built differently. Outside of men who are so old that their bodies are worn out, you might have asexual men due to medical conditions, or being eunuchs. A eunuch is a castrated man, having had his testicles removed, which are the chief factor in sex drive. (Matthew 19:10-12).

Some men might call themselves asexual as a defense mechanism because they cannot find a suitable partner. I wish I was asexual because it’s impossible for me to find anybody long-term at this point in my life. I do not recommend repression. But I advocate ignoring a hurtful aspect of your life so that you can concentrate on things that can work to your betterment.

Noticeably, numerous asexual people have joined themselves to LGBTQ causes, and even have a flag designed to resemble an alternative sexuality flag. But it is abnormal and unnatural for any person to have strong desires to be anyone or anything other than a human of their birth gender. It is abnormal and unnatural for anyone to have stronger sexual attraction to someone of their same gender rather than the opposite.

Asexual, like heterosexual, should be considered straight. And instead of dismantling traditional values, asexuality among us works like a saltness to help preserve old fashioned values.

*****My posts organized according to subject=

https://wordpress.com/settings/taxonomies/category/kcsunbeam.wordpress.com

Atheist H. Mehta’s 28 Questions for Christians Who Still Oppose Gay Marriage

Here is well-known Atheist Hemant Mehta’s 28 questions for Christians who still oppose gay marriage, coupled with my answers:

1) “Why insist that we take the Bible literally on the subject of homosexuality, but pretty much ignore what it says regarding all the other sins?” A: Although some dishonest and ignorant people cherry-pick the Bible in the manner you say, my emphasis on tackling all other sins is well documented.

2) “Why should our nation’s laws follow your interpretation of your holy book?” A: Because my interpretation is consistent with the interpretation of the earliest churchmen, who were godly de facto.

3) “What is a bigger problem in your opinion: a gay couple getting married, or a straight couple getting divorced?” A: A straight couple getting divorced, since it is a breakup of a God-ordained relationship, while in God’s eyes the gay couple made no change whatever in their status.

4) “If gay marriage and straight divorce are both sins, why do you spend so much energy fighting gay marriage?” A: This question does not apply to me since I spend my time and energy fighting other things. Now why do you spend so much energy promoting gay marriage?

5) “Why are you so obsessed with what other couples do in the bedroom?” A: I’m not. Ask someone who is.

6) “Do you think children are better off with two loving gay parents, or two straight parents who fight all the time?” A: To answer your either/or fallacy, two straight parents who fight all the time, on condition that they only fight with each other and do not abuse their children.

7) “Would you rather a child live with a single Christian parent or a loving mother and father who are hardcore Atheists?” A: Another either/or fallacy. Okay, the loving Atheist couple, on condition that they do not indoctrinate the child with Atheism.

8) “Why don’t you just tell me your hierarchy of ideal parents and tell me where loving gay parents rank on that list?” A: Instead of giving a hierarchy, here is my ideal: A loving father and mother who are non-hypocritical practitioners of conservative Christianity, and financially stable, intelligent, and wise.

9) “How many close gay friends do you have? If any, how many do you think consider you a close friend? Because they don’t, trust me.” A: I don’t see any friends; I’m a loner. But I used to have two close gay friends who knew I opposed same-sex marriage. It is your arrogant presumption to say they didn’t consider me a close friend.

10) “How has your life changed since gay marriage became legal everywhere?” A: It has not. And neither has it changed on account of numerous bad things that happen to others and not to me.

11) “Why oppose gay marriage because you supposedly cannot explain that to your kids? I’ll do it for you: two people love each other, so they got married.” A: What people cannot explain to their children are the questions that arise about how they have sex, not the wedding itself.

12) “How long do you think it will take before evangelical Christian churches finally embrace gay marriage? Because I give it a decade or less.” A: It doesn’t matter how long it will take since majority opinion never creates or equals truth.

13) “Why do you think you failed so miserably when it comes to convincing everyone else to uphold traditional marriage?” A: Because most people have no love for the truth and are hellbent on following their own selfish desires.

14) “Do you blame the message or the messenger?” A: I blame today’s messengers, because they distort the original message.

15) “Either way, why keep using the same arguments? And promoting the same leaders? It’s not working!” A: I agree. That is why I advocate using different arguments and promoting different leaders: those who uphold Third Position politics.

16) “How come the worst stories of discrimination I ever hear coming from Christianity involve a bakery owner being paid to make a cake they didn’t want to make, while like every LGBT person I’ve ever met has a personal discrimination story that is so much worse?” A: First, you ignore the fact that in other parts of the world Christians have been tortured and killed for their faith. Second, many gay people probably lie about having suffered terrible persecution when they did not.

17) “If the Supreme Court made the wrong decision, and it is unfair for some judges to overturn tradition, then why was it wrong when they overturned segregated schools?” A: They were also wrong to overturn segregated schools. They should have been kept segregated.

18) “If you say that marriage equality should have been left to individual states and voters, would you really have been okay if every state finally voted in favor of gay marriage?” A: I never say that *any* moral decision should be entrusted to *any* sector of our corrupt government.

19) “What if congress voted to make marriage equality legal?” [they did] A: They are still dead wrong. How about overthrowing our rotten government and installing a righteous government in its place?

20) “Why do you think God is really angry about gay marriage, but not nearly as upset about other really awful things? A: I don’t, since I’m not a hypocrite.

21) “What arguments against gay marriage don’t involve citing Bible verses?” A: My primary argument is that the great majority of the time, homosexuality is the direct result of the man/woman relationship being broken from things like feminism, “no-fault” divorce, the welfare state, etc.

22) “Since all churches allow couples to marry if they are unable to have kids, why use this ridiculous argument that marriages only count if kids can be produced?” A: This is not actually an argument that people use. Rather, it’s a straw man version of it. Their argument is that since natural human reproduction is always heterosexual, never homosexual, and God created Nature, this indicates God’s will on how people should couple.

23) “What do you think the government will force your church to do since gay marriage is legal? Because the correct answer is nothing.” A: Likely nothing. But in other countries preachers have been arrested and some thrown in jail simply because they spoke out against homosexuality.

24) “What will you do with all the Christians who support gay marriage and how do you feel about them?” A: I will teach alleged Christians what the original Church believed on marriage and homosexuality. I don’t feel anything about them.

25) “If you oppose gay marriage, and you oppose divorce, how do you feel about gay couples that get divorced? Is that really upsetting, or do two wrongs make a right?” A: Neither, as it doesn’t matter whether or not I stay married to a jar of dill pickles or get divorced from it. “Gay marriage” is a self-contradiction.

26) “Do you want gay couples to get divorced now that a lot of them are married?” A: Like I said, they are not married.

27) “Will you erect a sign in stone somewhere in your building that says: ‘We proudly oppose marriage equality’ (so as to be permanent). Because I think it won’t be long before a lot of churches come around on this issue. They will have to, to not lose all their members.” A: I don’t erect signs in stone since I’m not a caveman, do you? And I cannot erect a sign in the church building because it is not mine. If I ever have the opportunity of running my own church group, I will erect a printed sign in a frame declaring my position on homosexuality, divorce/ remarriage, and other issues.

28) “What has your church done in memory of all the LGBT kids who committed suicide because of the bullying and suffering they experienced, largely at the hands of other Christians?” A: Sadly, nothing. But I myself have publicly complained about injustices toward gay and trans people. Secondly, you have no right to label everyone who mistreated an LGBTQ person as Christian, since you have nothing to back that up. Thirdly, what have *you* done in memory of the millions of straight people around the world who have suffered horrible abuses for various reasons? Answer: NOTHING.

Radical Extremism?

Not only do most fellow Americans disagree with me, all Democrats and many Republicans refuse to discuss our differences, let alone debate me. Many immediately shun me just for the flag on my wall (which appears in Wikipedia’s Positive Christianity article). Are they are right in considering me an evil idiot? Or are they all brainwashed and inadvertently serving the Devil? I must conclude that one of those ideas must be true. That is because our ideologies are so radically different, they cannot be chalked up to mere difference of opinion. So either people who share my viewpoint are ignorant and serve Satan, OR society, both Democrats and Republicans, are ignorant and serve Satan.

Thankfully, my Christian religion says that the majority does not rule, God does. “Let God be true, but every man a liar.”———Romans 3:4. Now why don’t I just subscribe to “Tea Party” Republicanism or other more mainstream party considered conservative? I’d save myself so much rejection and condemnation. Yet consider that my “Tea Party” Republican father, who hates the Democratic party, made it clear that he doesn’t care what happens to our country after he’s dead because it won’t effect him. My Republican mother, who definitely opposes the Democratic party, has stated that she is unsure whether or not Communism is a bad thing.

We do have many Republicans who understand vital political facts, care about the future, and will gladly argue with liberal Democrats. Yet quoting Thomas Paine: “To argue with one who has renounce the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.” And most Republicans reject the Fascism I embrace without thinking twice about it. Instead, my flag represents radical action and physical force. Now what has been happening since conservatives have entrusted the salvation of America to squish Republicanism, Libertarianism, and other socially acceptable procedures?

In 2015 Nicholas Kollias, a White college student, and his Black frat brother Ani were lured and kidnapped by nine non-white men and women, the group led by a Black man. They were held for 40 hours. “Nicko” was tortured and robbed but his Black friend was not. They were rescued by a SWAT team in time, before their likely murder. In 2017 in Chicago, four Blacks kidnapped and tortured a mentally handicapped White man just because he voted Republican. They videotaped it and posted it to Facebook. In 2021 in New York, two Black teens snuck into a mentally handicapped White man’s home, sprayed him with ignitable fluid, and set him on fire. Seventy percent of his body ended up with second and third degree burns, and he died four days later.

Such cases are usually hidden from mainstream news, although non-white on White crime is FAR more frequent, while White on non-white crime is usually showcased. And non-white on White crime is NEVER labeled racist, while White on non-white crime is ALWAYS labeled racist. And now women are complaining about unfair wages more than ever before, while young women are now making more money than young men on average. In 2019, British Columbia Canada’s Supreme Court ordered that a 14 year old girl receive testosterone injections without parental consent, and that if either parent referred to her using female pronouns or her birth name, they would be considered guilty of family violence. The father was jailed.

And we now have Drag Queen Story Hour. These are events held in libraries, schools, and bookstores where gay men dressed as women and clowns read to a room full of three to eleven year-olds. The stories are geared toward promoting LGBTQ and other Communist agendas. Some of the men have convictions for child molesting or child pornography. One man wore no pants or underwear. His dress popped open, and the children saw his privates. Pornographic material has now hit mainstream television audiences, such as Cardi B and Megan Stallion’s music video WAP, featuring an all Black cast. In it they denounce the idea of women cooking or cleaning, simulate lesbian sex, and promote extremely high priced prostitution. For it they won the favorite song award.

Formerly fine cities San Francisco California, Portland Oregon, and especially Seattle Washington are now garbage dumps filled with homeless derelicts, sky-high crime, trash, and human waste. The reason is that almost all their homeless are addicted to heroin, crack cocaine, or crystal meth, and their liberal local governments do nothing to confiscate their drugs or get them into treatment. They will not even send the dope dealers to prison. And if a homeless person commits a violent crime, they get less than a week in jail. Many have had 50, 60, or 100 serious violations, yet freely roam the streets. If a member of law enforcement or city official attempts to tackle the problem, they get fired.

The theory is that since such people are disadvantaged, the rules don’t apply to them, instead of helping them to stop being disadvantaged. More Communism. Conservative Republican administrators could possibly get in there and fix the problems with solutions such as imprisoning the drug dealers. But administrations keep flip flopping back and forth. So all progress could be completely undone, such as by letting them all back out. But fascism would have all the dope dealers executed: a permanent solution. Over the last fifty years the number of Americans identifying as Christian has been cut in half, and the number of Americans identifying as Atheist or agnostic has tripled.

Early in our 21st century, a large statue of the demonic Baphomet was permanently installed by the Satanic Temple, while another statue is temporarily installed in the Illinois statehouse around the holidays. And thousands of Satanic items are for sale over the Internet. And now we have the first openly Communist Pope in Catholic Church history. And now even the American flag is sometimes considered a hate symbol and is banned at certain locations. While a 92 year old nearly blind veteran’s second American flag was being destroyed, the perpetrators slammed him to the ground, then ran off. To mention every single problem would probably take hours, but you should get the picture.

The overarching problem is that while liberal Democrats are hell-bent on destroying all traditional values and will to back it with coercion, intimidation and violence, the Republican party’s single focus is immediate financial gain. And this party apparently thinks that traditional values will return via osmosis: no effort required. Also, American Christians uphold separation of Church and State, leaving them with almost zero influence in society, since society is regulated by the State.

The National Socialist German Worker’s Party was very unlike these bastardized versions of supposed justice. So, readers who consider themselves conservative and/or Christian, your wimpy politics and wimpy religion have FAILED. So do not act like a brainwashed faggot by censoring me. Instead, embrace “Positive” or Third Reich Christianity: the idea of Jesus as warrior coupled with iron fist politics, BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE.

War on Words

I shall explain how communication, via both words and symbols, are misunderstood. First, here are reasons why it could be misunderstood: 1) Being too lazy to learn what someone’s symbols and words actually mean or not being taught properly. 2) Replacing one’s intellect with irrational emotion. 3) Being unfairly judgmental, stemming from a bloated sense of self-worth or an unloving or uncaring attitude toward others. Quoting John 7:24: “Judge not according to the appearance (that is, your initial impression), but judge righteous judgment. That is, take time to know others whom you don’t understand, and so evaluate them properly.

Now for symbols. The most controversial and hated symbol is the swastika. Since that is so, should we abandon its use? My conclusion: NO. That’s because it has been an extremely important cultural, philosophical, political, religious, and social symbol that has united mega-millions of likeminded people for at least the last 12,000 years. And this is not secret obscure knowledge; this is common knowledge found on the Internet. By the way, it was my grandfather who taught me how to draw a swastika.

Moreover, acquiescence creates a slippery slope: conceding to or forfeiting one relatively minor point gives others license to have their way over you until everything you stand for is obliterated. So Slippery Slope or Camel’s Nose on Wikipedia. For example, actress/comedian Sarah Silverman launched a complaint over construction markers which she mistook for swastikas. A man had the audacity to object to swastikas I displayed while he displayed a Confederate flag. Yet the ignorant also consider the Confederate flag a hate symbol which they falsely equate with slavery.

A White man displaying a Confederate flag in his rear car window was driven off the road by two Black men who then shot him dead because of that flag. In some circles the regular United States flag is considered a hate symbol. Sometimes even the LGBT flag has been deemed “not inclusive enough”, and so a star of David or black and brown stripes are sometimes added. Trying to ban all American Indian symbols in advertising and sports is another attempt to destroy tradition.

Now for words: Many normal everyday English words now have sexual or obscene definitions. Via society’s crudeness, normal definitions are often ignored. Example: cock. My introduction to the word was from the Cock Robin ice cream shop. Cock means a male bird. My Bible uses the word cock in Matthew 26:34, Mark 14:30, and other passages. Modern Bible translations use rooster, but that’s inaccurate, since hens do most of the roosting. Modern translations inaccurately translate thousands of passages. So, I’m not going to throw out my Bible. And when I was a child, dick meant Uncle Dick. In England dick means detective.

When I was a child, a special type of tree was prominent in our yard. My grandmother explained that those were pussy willows. That was my first exposure to that word. The scientific term for them is Salix capera. I had a friend who got frustrated with a woman friend because she kept making excuses for not going to church. He left a message on her answering machine saying, “When are you going to do it” (meaning, when are you going back to church). Her husband heard it and thought that meant they were having an affair and he was pressuring her for sex.

Some people react if you tell a coworker to service a customer. But to avoid its sexual double meaning you would need three word: render service to, or take care of, to replace the one. So should we avoid all words with a sexual, vulgar, or unpleasant second meaning so as not to offend people or reduce our conversation to a dirty joke? NO. Eventually every word in the English language may have a sexual or ugly second meaning. People just need to grow up, stop misjudging others, and educate themselves.

Some words are mistaken for hate speech. For example, a British man got temporarily banned off Facebook for showcasing the word faggots. He was referring to pork faggots, which is what they call sausage links in England. David Howard, aide to the mayor of Washington, D. C., used the word niggardly, meaning petty or reluctant in giving and spending, in reference to a budget. This upset a Black colleague, who took it as a racial slur and launched a complaint. Howard responded in an extremely cowardly and masochistic way, by profusely apologizing, declaring that people who aren’t Black are ignorant, and resigning from his job.

The front window of the Chop Chop Chinaman restaurant in Chicago was vandalized by a woman with the words: “F this hate crime shit. It’s 2015.” Not only that, the owner was partly Chinese. Besides, calling the Yellow race (which many call themselves) Asian is inaccurate, as White Russians are also in Asia, along with the entire country of India. Calling them Chinamen or Orientals is more appropriate. To be scientifically accurate, there are three major races: Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid. This classification is not obsolete; it is currently valid. This is known from the fact that hair samples of murder suspects are put into one of these three categories by forensic scientists: highly educated intelligent people who do the best, most accurate job in matters of life and death.

If we continue to avoid words because idiots put a pornographic or bigoted label on them, and avoid cherished symbols, artwork, and products because some complain about their bad connotation, eventually all traditional values may be wiped out. Consider that no Christmas decorations are allowed on White House property, but Hanukkah decorations are.

Besides, objectionable words already fill classical literature, such as old poetry books, Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn, and others, which referred to Black people as n******. Many statues are of now objectionable figures such as Confederate soldiers. Innumerous films, filmmakers, musicians, religious leaders, and inventors are labeled as intolerably bigoted. Traditional men’s and women’s clothing may eventually be labeled as unacceptably sexist. And on and on. The solution is not to burn down and tear down the entire Western civilization, which is the goal of social Marxists. This may include killing and destroying the people themselves. So, to Hell with politically correct Leftists. FIGHT BACK NOW.